CTCAX vs. USNQX

In the year-to-date period, CTCAX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than USNQX's 2.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CTCAX having a 16.07% annualized return and USNQX not far behind at 15.49%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CTCAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the USNQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTCAX and USNQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CTCAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

The maximum CTCAX drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, smaller than the maximum USNQX drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTCAX and USNQX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) have volatilities of 6.70% and 6.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.