SSCPX vs. FKASX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) and FKASX (Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX returned 12.10%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for FKASX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCPX charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for FKASX.

Performance

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCPX achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than FKASX's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX has underperformed FKASX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while FKASX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.47% annualized return.

SSCPX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 23.90%
• 1Y: 40.72%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 12.10%

FKASX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 7.87%
• YTD: 15.85%
• 6M: 12.94%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 16.23%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 14.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	27.15%	6.41%	10.79%	15.16%	-17.56%	24.53%	25.39%	23.71%	-16.14%	15.58%
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	15.85%	12.01%	14.45%	14.48%	-31.40%	2.57%	43.41%	33.44%	7.30%	37.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCPX and FKASX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2002	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between SSCPX and FKASX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SSCPX vs. FKASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCPX

SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FKASX

FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCPX	FKASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.32	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	1.99	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.26	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	1.88	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.49	7.78	+4.71

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FKASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCPX and FKASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum FKASX drawdown of -60.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and FKASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCPX	FKASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.65%	-60.21%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-14.88%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.78%	-26.19%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.78%	-44.51%	+16.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.59%	-44.86%	+1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.23%	-12.66%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	3.58%	-0.19%

Volatility

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) is 6.15%, while Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that SSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCPX	FKASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	7.34%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.17%	17.48%	-2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.28%	21.18%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.22%	23.55%	-1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.05%	22.44%	+0.61%

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FKASX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCPX vs. FKASX - Dividend Comparison

SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than FKASX's 17.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	17.87%	20.70%	11.82%	0.15%	0.00%	8.40%	0.12%	0.21%	6.36%	6.50%	0.76%	8.55%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	7.09%	9.02%	11.37%	0.00%	10.18%	24.67%	0.02%	0.00%	17.42%	0.00%	0.00%	58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCPX and FKASX in my portfolio?

SSCPX and FKASX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCPX or FKASX?

FKASX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SSCPX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCPX dropped -53.65% vs FKASX's -60.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.