SRS vs. QLD
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -15.86%/yr vs 34.58%/yr for QLD. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SRS vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -19.00% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 30.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -15.86%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 34.58% annualized return.
SRS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -19.00%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- -11.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.57%
- 10Y*
- -15.86%
QLD
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 26.30%
- YTD
- 30.96%
- 1Y
- 54.67%
- 3Y*
- 40.14%
- 5Y*
- 20.25%
- 10Y*
- 34.58%
SRS vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -19.00% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -38.97% | 6.01% | -18.03% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 30.96% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and QLD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.54 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SRS and QLD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.54 to -0.01, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
QLD
SRS vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.19 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 7.14 | -8.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -83.13% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -25.13% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -42.29% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -63.68% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.30% | -63.68% | -22.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -8.29% | -91.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.26% | -18.11% | -73.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.22% | 7.68% | +3.54% |
Volatility
SRS vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is 10.31%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 16.07%. This indicates that SRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 16.07% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 30.65% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 37.05% | -8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 45.57% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 44.86% | -4.07% |
SRS vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SRS and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SRS vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.56% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and QLD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (16.07%) compared to SRS (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 34.58% vs -15.86% for SRS. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SRS has been the lower-risk option at 10.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 34.58% return vs -15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRS and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer