SRS vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -16.52%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. At a correlation of -0.55, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SRS vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -16.52%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.

SRS

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: -14.05%
• 6M: -12.14%
• 1Y: -9.76%
• 3Y*: -12.75%
• 5Y*: -5.84%
• 10Y*: -16.52%

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRS vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate	-14.05%	-1.45%	-3.55%	-18.78%	54.68%	-52.22%	-33.05%	-38.97%	6.01%	-18.03%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SRS and QLD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	-0.55

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SRS and QLD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.55 to -0.16, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

SRS vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SRS	QLD
Financial Services	71.8%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

SRS vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRS

SRS Risk / Return Rank: 5
SRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
SRS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
SRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRS vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRS	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	2.70	-3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	3.16	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.41	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	3.42	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	11.92	-12.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRS vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRS and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRS	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36	2.70	-3.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.58	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.41	0.81	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.50	0.60	-1.09

Drawdowns

SRS vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRS	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-83.13%	-16.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.53%	-25.13%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.56%	-42.29%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.56%	-63.68%	+12.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.82%	-63.68%	-22.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-0.53%	-99.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.23%	-18.17%	-73.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.08%	7.20%	+1.88%

Volatility

SRS vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is 7.58%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that SRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRS	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	8.90%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	24.08%	-4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.06%	31.85%	-4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.58%	44.74%	-7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.67%	44.56%	-3.89%

SRS vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SRS and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SRS vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate	3.67%	3.61%	6.06%	4.49%	0.30%	0.00%	0.19%	1.80%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRS and QLD in my portfolio?

SRS and QLD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRS or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to SRS (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, SRS or QLD?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs -16.52% for SRS. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SRS or QLD?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs -16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRS or QLD?

SRS and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SRS or QLD?

SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

What is the main difference between SRS and QLD?

SRS is categorized as REIT, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.