SROI vs. BDVL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SROI is actively managed, while BDVL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.

Performance

SROI vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.

SROI

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDVL

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 4.71%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	11.06%	2.53%
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	4.71%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and BDVL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.84

SROI vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SROI	BDVL
Technology	29.6%	23.0%
Industrials	18.1%	15.4%
Financial Services	13.6%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	8.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	11.1%
Communication Services	7.4%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	6.3%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.6%
Utilities	2.5%	4.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.8%	2.8%

Return for Risk

SROI vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 46
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SROI	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SROI	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.01	0.00

Drawdowns

SROI vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and BDVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	BDVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-7.71%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.95%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-1.19%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SROI	BDVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	9.49%	+3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	9.49%	+4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.87%	9.49%	+4.38%

SROI vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SROI vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	2.66%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SROI and BDVL in my portfolio?

SROI and BDVL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SROI or BDVL?

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SROI or BDVL?

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SROI or BDVL?

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.

What is the main difference between SROI and BDVL?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.40% for BDVL.