PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.53%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


SRLN

1D
0.07%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
4.53%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.80%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and VOO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.47

The correlation between SRLN and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRLN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRLN
VOO

Communication Services

91.8%
11.3%

Industrials

8.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Communication Services

SRLN
91.8%
VOO
11.3%

Industrials

SRLN
8.2%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

SRLN

-

VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SRLN

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

SRLN

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

SRLN

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

SRLN

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

SRLN

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

SRLN

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

SRLN

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

SRLN

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRLNVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.53

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.43

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.42

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.54

15.95

-9.40

SRLN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRLNVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.53

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.85

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.87

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.89

-0.19

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-33.99%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-8.90%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-18.69%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-24.52%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-33.99%

+11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-3.69%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.91%

-1.03%

Volatility

SRLN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.41%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.74%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

8.88%

-6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

11.78%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

16.81%

-12.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

18.01%

-11.95%

SRLN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.48%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and VOO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to SRLN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 4.53% for SRLN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.48%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

SRLN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. SRLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer