PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SRLN having a 4.55% annualized return and BKLN not far behind at 4.33%.


SRLN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.55%

BKLN

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
4.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.63%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-0.03%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and BKLN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013

0.62

The correlation between SRLN and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRLNBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.45

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

5.68

+0.23

SRLN vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-24.17%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-3.07%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-3.55%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-7.31%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-24.17%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.47%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-1.09%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.78%

+0.10%

Volatility

SRLN vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.53%. This indicates that SRLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.53%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.54%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

2.77%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

4.48%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.43%

-0.37%

SRLN vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than BKLN's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
7.16%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.50%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and BKLN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRLN has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to BKLN (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 10-year performance, SRLN leads with 4.55% vs 4.33% for BKLN. On fees, BKLN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SRLN has performed better with a 4.55% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 7.16% for BKLN.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.65% for BKLN.

SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer