PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than USHY's 1.78% return.


SRLN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.55%

USHY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.04%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.63%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%0.25%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.78%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and USHY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.56

The correlation between SRLN and USHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRLNUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.76

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

12.34

-6.44

SRLN vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, roughly equal to the maximum USHY drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-22.44%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.43%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-4.66%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-15.56%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.11%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-2.65%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.54%

+0.34%

Volatility

SRLN vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.60%, while iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.94%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.97%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

3.68%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

7.35%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

8.23%

-2.17%

SRLN vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than USHY's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.50%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.90%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and USHY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USHY has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to SRLN (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, SRLN leads with 4.52% vs 4.21% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SRLN has performed better with a 4.52% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 6.90% for USHY.

SRLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.15% for USHY.

USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer