SRINX vs. CBALX
SRINX (Columbia Corporate Income Fund) and CBALX (Columbia Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - SRINX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Columbia, while CBALX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, SRINX returned 3.01%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for CBALX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRINX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for CBALX.
Performance
SRINX vs. CBALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRINX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than CBALX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SRINX has underperformed CBALX with an annualized return of 3.01%, while CBALX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
SRINX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
CBALX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 6.03%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
SRINX vs. CBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRINX Columbia Corporate Income Fund | 0.73% | 7.34% | 2.05% | 9.17% | -15.52% | -0.69% | 11.38% | 15.28% | -3.50% | 5.95% |
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund | 6.03% | 14.14% | 14.60% | 21.49% | -16.63% | 14.92% | 17.91% | 23.05% | -5.75% | 14.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRINX and CBALX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, SRINX and CBALX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRINX vs. CBALX — Risk / Return Rank
SRINX
CBALX
SRINX vs. CBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRINX | CBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.64 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 11.01 | -4.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRINX vs. CBALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRINX drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum CBALX drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRINX and CBALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRINX | CBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -34.53% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -6.63% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.02% | -12.06% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -20.91% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.63% | -22.73% | +1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.74% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -5.31% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 1.58% | -0.71% |
Volatility
SRINX vs. CBALX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) is 1.26%, while Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that SRINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRINX | CBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 3.74% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 7.12% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01% | 8.77% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 11.17% | -4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 11.39% | -5.57% |
SRINX vs. CBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRINX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than CBALX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRINX vs. CBALX - Dividend Comparison
SRINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than CBALX's 6.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund | 6.19% | 6.42% | 7.83% | 1.84% | 5.36% | 9.26% | 5.31% | 4.16% | 5.82% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.05% |
SRINX Columbia Corporate Income Fund | 4.63% | 4.53% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 6.71% | 3.10% | 3.23% | 2.69% | 3.02% | 3.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRINX and CBALX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBALX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SRINX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRINX dropped -21.63% vs CBALX's -34.53%.
CBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRINX and CBALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer