PortfoliosLab logo
CBALX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CBALX and VOO is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CBALX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
161.53%
574.26%
CBALX
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CBALX:

0.11

VOO:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

CBALX:

0.23

VOO:

0.92

Omega Ratio

CBALX:

1.04

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CBALX:

0.09

VOO:

0.58

Martin Ratio

CBALX:

0.26

VOO:

2.25

Ulcer Index

CBALX:

5.55%

VOO:

4.83%

Daily Std Dev

CBALX:

13.17%

VOO:

19.11%

Max Drawdown

CBALX:

-35.45%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CBALX:

-9.17%

VOO:

-7.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBALX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CBALX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.76%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


CBALX

YTD

-1.31%

1M

8.24%

6M

-7.40%

1Y

1.39%

5Y*

5.43%

10Y*

4.76%

VOO

YTD

-3.28%

1M

13.71%

6M

-4.52%

1Y

10.70%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBALX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBALX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBALX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBALX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CBALX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CBALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBALX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.11
0.56
CBALX
VOO

Dividends

CBALX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than VOO's 1.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
7.96%7.83%1.84%5.36%9.26%5.31%4.16%5.82%2.79%1.60%4.05%4.76%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.34%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CBALX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBALX drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBALX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.17%
-7.55%
CBALX
VOO

Volatility

CBALX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) is 6.75%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that CBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.75%
11.03%
CBALX
VOO