PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRINX vs. FIKOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) and Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (FIKOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRINX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than FIKOX's 0.59% return.


SRINX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
3.04%

FIKOX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRINX
Columbia Corporate Income Fund
0.73%7.34%2.05%9.17%-15.52%-0.69%11.38%15.28%-0.27%
FIKOX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
0.59%7.96%2.83%8.64%-17.06%-1.60%10.91%14.58%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SRINX and FIKOX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.94

The correlation between SRINX and FIKOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRINX vs. FIKOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRINX
SRINX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SRINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SRINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKOX
FIKOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FIKOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) and Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (FIKOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRINXFIKOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.71

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

5.60

+0.75

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FIKOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRINX and FIKOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRINXFIKOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.06

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.48

+0.61

Drawdowns

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRINX drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum FIKOX drawdown of -23.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRINX and FIKOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRINXFIKOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-23.22%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.22%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-6.56%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-23.22%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.01%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-6.65%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.98%

-0.13%

Volatility

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) and Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (FIKOX) have volatilities of 1.46% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRINXFIKOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

1.42%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

3.10%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

4.33%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

6.70%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

6.53%

-0.72%

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRINX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKOX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRINX vs. FIKOX - Dividend Comparison

SRINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FIKOX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKOX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
4.33%4.20%4.05%3.51%2.62%2.90%3.47%3.37%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRINX
Columbia Corporate Income Fund
4.63%4.53%3.70%3.63%3.10%4.32%6.71%3.10%3.23%2.69%3.02%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SRINX and FIKOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SRINX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FIKOX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRINX dropped -21.63% vs FIKOX's -23.22%.

SRINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRINX and FIKOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer