PortfoliosLab logo
CBALX vs. PSFF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CBALX and PSFF is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CBALX vs. PSFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CBALX:

0.79

PSFF:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

CBALX:

1.08

PSFF:

0.99

Omega Ratio

CBALX:

1.15

PSFF:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CBALX:

0.73

PSFF:

0.68

Martin Ratio

CBALX:

2.82

PSFF:

2.68

Ulcer Index

CBALX:

3.10%

PSFF:

2.75%

Daily Std Dev

CBALX:

12.18%

PSFF:

10.90%

Max Drawdown

CBALX:

-34.53%

PSFF:

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

CBALX:

-1.79%

PSFF:

-2.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBALX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than PSFF's 0.48% return.


CBALX

YTD

1.83%

1M

3.45%

6M

0.01%

1Y

8.86%

3Y*

9.76%

5Y*

9.95%

10Y*

8.36%

PSFF

YTD

0.48%

1M

2.83%

6M

0.31%

1Y

7.41%

3Y*

11.02%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbia Balanced Fund

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

CBALX vs. PSFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBALX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PSFF's 0.93% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBALX vs. PSFF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBALX is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBALX is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBALX is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBALX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBALX is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBALX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PSFF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSFF is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSFF is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSFF is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSFF is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSFF is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSFF is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CBALX vs. PSFF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CBALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the PSFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBALX and PSFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CBALX vs. PSFF - Dividend Comparison

CBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, while PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
7.72%7.83%1.84%5.36%9.26%5.31%4.16%5.83%2.79%1.59%4.05%4.76%
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CBALX vs. PSFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBALX drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, which is greater than PSFF's maximum drawdown of -10.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBALX and PSFF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CBALX vs. PSFF - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) at 2.76%. This indicates that CBALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...