PortfoliosLab logo
CBALX vs. TIBAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CBALX and TIBAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CBALX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
325.09%
686.77%
CBALX
TIBAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CBALX:

0.11

TIBAX:

1.47

Sortino Ratio

CBALX:

0.23

TIBAX:

2.09

Omega Ratio

CBALX:

1.04

TIBAX:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CBALX:

0.09

TIBAX:

1.92

Martin Ratio

CBALX:

0.26

TIBAX:

7.32

Ulcer Index

CBALX:

5.55%

TIBAX:

2.41%

Daily Std Dev

CBALX:

13.17%

TIBAX:

11.45%

Max Drawdown

CBALX:

-35.45%

TIBAX:

-46.73%

Current Drawdown

CBALX:

-9.17%

TIBAX:

-0.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBALX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CBALX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 4.76%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.30% annualized return.


CBALX

YTD

-1.31%

1M

8.24%

6M

-7.40%

1Y

1.39%

5Y*

5.43%

10Y*

4.76%

TIBAX

YTD

10.23%

1M

10.68%

6M

9.25%

1Y

16.72%

5Y*

15.16%

10Y*

7.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBALX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBALX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBALX vs. TIBAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBALX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBALX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIBAX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CBALX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CBALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBALX and TIBAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.11
1.47
CBALX
TIBAX

Dividends

CBALX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

CBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than TIBAX's 4.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
7.96%7.83%1.84%5.36%9.26%5.31%4.16%5.82%2.79%1.60%4.05%4.76%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.18%4.57%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%5.20%

Drawdowns

CBALX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBALX drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -46.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBALX and TIBAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.17%
-0.57%
CBALX
TIBAX

Volatility

CBALX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 4.99%. This indicates that CBALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.75%
4.99%
CBALX
TIBAX