PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRAD vs. ZS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SRAD vs. ZS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SRAD vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
-30.04%37.08%56.92%10.94%-43.31%-29.86%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-39.24%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%16.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SRAD:

$5.29B

ZS:

$21.82B

EPS

SRAD:

$0.31

ZS:

-$0.43

PS Ratio

SRAD:

4.13

ZS:

7.17

PB Ratio

SRAD:

5.41

ZS:

9.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRAD:

$1.29B

ZS:

$3.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRAD:

$619.35M

ZS:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

SRAD:

$458.70M

ZS:

$56.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRAD achieves a -30.04% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -39.24% return.


SRAD

1D
-0.66%
1M
-15.07%
YTD
-30.04%
6M
-37.27%
1Y
-23.47%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
10Y*

ZS

1D
-2.58%
1M
-8.02%
YTD
-39.24%
6M
-55.12%
1Y
-32.03%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
-4.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRAD vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRAD
SRAD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SRAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRAD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SRAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRAD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRAD vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRADZSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

-0.70

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

-0.79

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.52

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-1.18

+0.24

SRAD vs. ZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the ZS Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRAD and ZS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRADZSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-0.70

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.34

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between SRAD and ZS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SRAD vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SRAD nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SRAD vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRAD drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, roughly equal to the maximum ZS drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRAD and ZS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SRADZSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-76.41%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.57%

-60.40%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.69%

-62.94%

+15.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.94%

-31.98%

-12.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.57%

26.39%

-1.82%

Volatility

SRAD vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has a higher volatility of 16.24% compared to Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) at 13.44%. This indicates that SRAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SRADZSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.24%

13.44%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.08%

36.35%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.33%

46.06%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.66%

53.26%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.66%

57.01%

-5.35%

Financials

SRAD vs. ZS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sportradar Group AG and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
365.43M
815.75M
(SRAD) Total Revenue
(ZS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SRAD vs. ZS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sportradar Group AG and Zscaler, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.8%
76.6%
Portfolio components
SRAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a gross profit of 87.07M and revenue of 365.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.

ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 624.49M and revenue of 815.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.

SRAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported an operating income of 22.22M and revenue of 365.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -51.77M and revenue of 815.75M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.4%.

SRAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 365.43M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -34.31M and revenue of 815.75M, resulting in a net margin of -4.2%.