SQY vs. YMAG
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
SQY vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -4.51%
- 6M
- -5.77%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YMAG
SQY vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.50% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.40% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.72% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.99% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.99% | — |
SQY vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 54.33% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SQY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 54.33%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 1.28% for YMAG.
Find the right allocation for SQY and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer