YMAG vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YMAG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. YMAG is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past year, YMAG returned 18.97% vs 26.77% for VOO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

YMAG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.

YMAG

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -6.74%
• YTD: -2.22%
• 6M: -2.56%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	-2.22%	18.64%	34.66%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and VOO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.83

The correlation between YMAG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YMAG	VOO
Financial Services	99.0%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.6%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

YMAG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 30
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAG	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.17	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.93	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	3.02	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	13.58	-9.17

YMAG vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAG	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-33.99%	+8.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.38%	-8.90%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.35%	-1.74%	-6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-3.68%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	1.98%	+2.34%

Volatility

YMAG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that YMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAG	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	4.60%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	9.73%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	12.39%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.99%	16.90%	+4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.99%	18.05%	+2.94%

YMAG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.06%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	53.06%	52.27%	35.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAG and VOO in my portfolio?

YMAG and VOO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAG or VOO?

YMAG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, YMAG or VOO?

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 26.77% vs 18.97% for YMAG. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAG or VOO?

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAG or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAG or VOO?

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 53.06%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

What is the main difference between YMAG and VOO?

YMAG is categorized as Derivative Income, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.