SQQQ vs. GPIQ
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. SQQQ is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, SQQQ returned -54.82% vs 25.84% for GPIQ. Their -0.99 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -38.05% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 13.18% return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -34.63%
- YTD
- -38.05%
- 1Y
- -54.82%
- 3Y*
- -52.10%
- 5Y*
- -44.80%
- 10Y*
- -54.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.82%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.39M | $82.61M | $83.97M | |
| $2.77B | $2.43B | $2.72B |
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -38.05% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -37.01% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 13.18% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and GPIQ is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | -0.99 |
The correlation between SQQQ and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQQQ
GPIQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SQQQ
GPIQ
Basic Materials
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Communication Services
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Consumer Cyclical
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Consumer Defensive
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Energy
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Healthcare
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Industrials
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Real Estate
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Technology
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Utilities
SQQQ
-
GPIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
GPIQ
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.28 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 2.73 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 9.62 | -11.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -21.06% | -78.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.62% | -9.51% | -50.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -4.62% | -95.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.78% | -2.34% | -90.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.25% | 2.69% | +32.56% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 21.07% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 6.41%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.07% | 6.41% | +14.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.20% | 14.11% | +34.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.95% | 16.68% | +41.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.24% | 18.06% | +50.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.78% | 18.06% | +48.72% |
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, less than GPIQ's 10.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.15% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.64% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and GPIQ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to GPIQ (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 25.84% vs -54.82% for SQQQ. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 25.84% return vs -54.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.15%, compared with 9.64% for SQQQ.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer