SQLV vs. SMIG
Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG).
SQLV and SMIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SQLV is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 12, 2017. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.
Performance
SQLV vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SQLV vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 2.33% | 2.50% | 4.76% | 21.21% | -12.86% | 5.93% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.39% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SQLV having a 2.33% return and SMIG slightly higher at 2.39%.
SQLV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 17.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SMIG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SQLV vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SQLV and SMIG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
SQLV vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank
SQLV
SMIG
SQLV vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQLV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.30 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 0.54 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.07 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.44 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 1.44 | +3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQLV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.30 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.34 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SQLV and SMIG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SQLV vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison
SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than SMIG's 1.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.24% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 0.40% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SQLV vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than SMIG's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and SMIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQLV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -19.65% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -11.92% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -7.01% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -6.72% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.67% | +0.12% |
Volatility
SQLV vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) at 4.02%. This indicates that SQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SQLV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 4.02% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 8.36% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 15.98% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 16.33% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 16.33% | +7.17% |