SMIG vs. SFLO
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO).
SMIG and SFLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. SFLO is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023.
Performance
SMIG vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.49% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 1.05% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 3.19% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than SFLO's 3.19% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 33.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
SFLO
SMIG vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 0.95 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 1.46 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.45 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 6.26 | -5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.95 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and SFLO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than SFLO's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum SFLO drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and SFLO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -26.63% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -7.80% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -0.72% | -6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -4.58% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.90% | -0.18% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 3.98%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.73% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.33% | 11.99% | -3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 23.98% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 20.78% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 20.78% | -4.47% |