SPYV vs. BOTZ
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYV returned 10.98%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 2.46% return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 2.46% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and BOTZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SPYV and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
BOTZ
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
BOTZ
Financial Services
SPYV
BOTZ
Healthcare
SPYV
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
BOTZ
Industrials
SPYV
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
BOTZ
Energy
SPYV
BOTZ
Utilities
SPYV
BOTZ
Real Estate
SPYV
BOTZ
-
Basic Materials
SPYV
BOTZ
Communication Services
SPYV
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
BOTZ
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.14 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 0.99 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 3.26 | +9.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -55.54% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -19.34% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -29.02% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -55.54% | +37.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -10.83% | +10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -18.29% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 5.84% | -4.21% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 8.89% | -6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 19.49% | -12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 25.07% | -15.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 26.90% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 25.79% | -8.85% |
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYV vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than BOTZ's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, SPYV leads with 10.98% vs 1.51% for BOTZ. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.64% for BOTZ.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while BOTZ is Robotics. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.68% for BOTZ.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer