PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYM having a 10.15% return and SPYV slightly lower at 10.14%. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 15.15%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.92% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
0.68%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.55%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
11.17%

SPYV

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
11.92%
ALL TIME*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$811.10M$977.30M$1.09B
$129.05M$117.43M$146.49M

SPYM vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.15%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
10.14%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SPYV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.80

The correlation between SPYM and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SPYV

Technology

38.5%
21.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.1%

Communication Services

9.9%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.2%

Industrials

8.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.8%

Energy

3.0%
6.6%

Utilities

2.2%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.3%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
SPYV
21.7%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.6%
SPYV
15.1%

Communication Services

SPYM
9.9%
SPYV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.5%
SPYV
10.6%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.9%
SPYV
12.2%

Industrials

SPYM
8.4%
SPYV
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
SPYV
8.8%

Energy

SPYM
3.0%
SPYV
6.6%

Utilities

SPYM
2.2%
SPYV
4.5%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SPYV
3.3%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYM vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.17

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

12.28

-2.85

SPYM vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-58.45%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.22%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-17.54%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-17.89%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-36.89%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.13%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-8.67%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.61%

+0.47%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.72%. This indicates that SPYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.72%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

7.14%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

9.99%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

14.30%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

16.88%

+1.13%

SPYM vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPYV's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and SPYV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SPYV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.15% vs 11.92% for SPYV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.03% for SPYM.

SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer