PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 15.03%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.81% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
11.15%

SCHC

1D
-0.52%
1M
-3.47%
6M
0.04%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
7.81%
ALL TIME*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.47%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
4.65%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SCHC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.72

The correlation between SPYM and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYM vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SCHC

Technology

38.5%
8.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
5.0%

Industrials

8.4%
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.9%

Energy

3.0%
5.3%

Utilities

2.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
13.1%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
SCHC
8.6%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.6%
SCHC
15.9%

Communication Services

SPYM
9.9%
SCHC
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.5%
SCHC
9.4%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.9%
SCHC
5.0%

Industrials

SPYM
8.4%
SCHC
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
SCHC
3.9%

Energy

SPYM
3.0%
SCHC
5.3%

Utilities

SPYM
2.2%
SCHC
2.8%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SCHC
6.2%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SCHC
13.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.23

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

3.97

+5.66

SPYM vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-43.94%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-12.48%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-15.30%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-36.48%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-43.94%

+10.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-7.55%

+5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-10.02%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.85%

-1.80%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.43%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

4.14%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

14.33%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

16.46%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.62%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

17.80%

+0.20%

SPYM vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SCHC's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.54%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and SCHC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHC has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SPYM (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.03% vs 7.81% for SCHC. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHC.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.04% for SPYM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.08% for SCHC.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer