SPYM vs. RPG
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.62%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
SPYM vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 31.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed RPG with an annualized return of 15.62%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.81% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
SPYM vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and RPG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SPYM and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYM vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
RPG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYM
RPG
Financial Services
SPYM
RPG
Communication Services
SPYM
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
RPG
Healthcare
SPYM
RPG
Industrials
SPYM
RPG
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
RPG
Energy
SPYM
RPG
Utilities
SPYM
RPG
Real Estate
SPYM
RPG
Basic Materials
SPYM
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
RPG
SPYM vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYM | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.09 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 2.82 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.72 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.76 | 14.56 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYM | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.09 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.56 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.65 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.54 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, roughly equal to the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -53.27% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -11.08% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -24.75% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -35.59% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -36.58% | +2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | 0.00% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -8.84% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.83% | -0.92% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 2.83%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 6.43% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 16.26% | -7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 19.73% | -7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 23.44% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 22.70% | -4.70% |
SPYM vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYM vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYM and RPG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 14.81% for RPG. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.35% for RPG.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer