PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 15.03%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
11.15%

QYLD

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.71%
6M
5.96%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.47%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.22%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and QYLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.77

The correlation between SPYM and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYM vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
QYLD

Technology

38.5%
59.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
3.6%

Industrials

8.4%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.3%

Energy

3.0%
0.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
QYLD
59.2%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.6%
QYLD
0.2%

Communication Services

SPYM
9.9%
QYLD
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.5%
QYLD
10.6%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.9%
QYLD
3.6%

Industrials

SPYM
8.4%
QYLD
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
QYLD
6.3%

Energy

SPYM
3.0%
QYLD
0.5%

Utilities

SPYM
2.2%
QYLD
1.2%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
QYLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
QYLD
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.04

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

19.75

-10.12

SPYM vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-24.75%

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-4.97%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-19.06%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-24.61%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-24.75%

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-3.37%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-3.81%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.01%

+1.04%

Volatility

SPYM vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.43%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

5.86%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

9.67%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

10.83%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

14.98%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

15.60%

+2.40%

SPYM vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYM vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than QYLD's 12.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
12.88%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and QYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to SPYM (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.03% vs 9.59% for QYLD. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.88%, compared with 1.04% for SPYM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer