SPYH vs. TRIO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 18.78% vs 14.67% for TRIO. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TRIO.

Performance

SPYH vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYH having a 5.74% return and TRIO slightly lower at 5.46%.

SPYH

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 6.16%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRIO

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	5.74%	21.09%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	5.46%	16.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and TRIO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.96

The correlation between SPYH and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPYH vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH

SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 78

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 77
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYH	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.40	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.54	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.48	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.30	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.14	16.55	-1.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYH vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYH	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.40	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.93	1.35	+0.58

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, smaller than the maximum TRIO drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and TRIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYH	TRIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.39%	-9.88%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.02%	-4.47%	-1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.17%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-0.79%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	0.89%	+0.35%

Volatility

SPYH vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) at 1.01%. This indicates that SPYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYH	TRIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	1.01%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	4.77%	+1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.80%	6.14%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	10.71%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.36%	10.71%	+1.65%

SPYH vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYH vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, less than TRIO's 8.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.54%	5.54%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.54%	9.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYH and TRIO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SPYH and TRIO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPYH or TRIO?

SPYH has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to TRIO (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

Which ETF is better, SPYH or TRIO?

On 1-year performance, SPYH leads with 18.78% vs 14.67% for TRIO. On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYH or TRIO?

Over the 1-year period, SPYH has performed better with a 18.78% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYH or TRIO?

SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TRIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYH or TRIO?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.54%, compared with 7.54% for SPYH.

What is the main difference between SPYH and TRIO?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and ETF Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.70% for TRIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.