PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. THEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. THEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYH having a 5.96% return and THEQ slightly lower at 5.82%.


SPYH

1D
0.69%
1M
0.68%
6M
4.69%
YTD
5.96%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.88%

THEQ

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.09%
6M
4.50%
YTD
5.82%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$472.46K$589.47K$594.95K
$98.98K$94.04K$172.37K

SPYH vs. THEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and THEQ is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.96

The correlation between SPYH and THEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYH vs. THEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYH
THEQ

Technology

38.1%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.0%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.3%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.1%

Energy

3.1%
3.6%

Utilities

2.4%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

SPYH
38.1%
THEQ
35.4%

Financial Services

SPYH
11.7%
THEQ
12.3%

Communication Services

SPYH
10.0%
THEQ
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYH
9.3%
THEQ
9.5%

Healthcare

SPYH
9.1%
THEQ
9.3%

Industrials

SPYH
8.1%
THEQ
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYH
4.8%
THEQ
5.1%

Energy

SPYH
3.1%
THEQ
3.6%

Utilities

SPYH
2.4%
THEQ
3.0%

Real Estate

SPYH
1.9%
THEQ
1.6%

Basic Materials

SPYH
1.7%
THEQ
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. THEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYH vs. THEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYHTHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.93

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

7.73

+2.41

SPYH vs. THEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the THEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and THEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. THEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum THEQ drawdown of -8.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and THEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHTHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-8.20%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-6.17%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.74%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.07%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.54%

-0.19%

Volatility

SPYH vs. THEQ - Volatility Comparison

NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHTHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.77%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

7.13%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

9.32%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

11.46%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

11.46%

+0.71%

SPYH vs. THEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than THEQ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. THEQ - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than THEQ's 0.75% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPYH and THEQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

THEQ has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SPYH (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs THEQ's -8.20%.

On 1-year performance, SPYH leads with 14.86% vs 12.97% for THEQ. On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYH has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 0.75% for THEQ.

SPYH is categorized as Derivative Income, while THEQ is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Neos and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.46% for THEQ.

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and THEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer