SPYH vs. PHDG
SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. SPYH is actively managed, while PHDG is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 15.64% vs 19.71% for PHDG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PHDG.
Performance
SPYH vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 9.81% return.
SPYH
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
SPYH vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 3.89% | 20.01% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 9.81% | 4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYH and PHDG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SPYH and PHDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYH vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank
SPYH
PHDG
SPYH vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.50 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 15.28 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYH vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and PHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -17.70% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -5.66% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -5.66% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -6.23% | +5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 1.29% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SPYH vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 3.28%, while Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 7.76% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 9.60% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.28% | 11.39% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 11.41% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 12.11% | +0.33% |
SPYH vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYH vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison
SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than PHDG's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.69% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.68% | 5.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYH and PHDG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHDG has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to SPYH (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs PHDG's -17.70%.
On 1-year performance, PHDG leads with 19.71% vs 15.64% for SPYH. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHDG has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.
SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 1.69% for PHDG.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.39% for PHDG.
SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYH and PHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer