TRIO vs. HOLA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TRIO returned 12.28% vs 13.44% for HOLA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRIO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.

Performance

TRIO vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIO achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 5.43% return.

TRIO

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 4.73%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 1Y: 12.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOLA

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 13.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIO vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	6.06%	5.86%
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	5.43%	7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIO and HOLA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

TRIO vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 80
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

HOLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIO vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRIO	HOLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	—	—

Drawdowns

TRIO vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIO drawdown since its inception was -9.88%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIO and HOLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRIO	HOLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.88%	-6.99%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.47%	-6.99%	+2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.41%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-1.41%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRIO	HOLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.22%	9.96%	-3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.42%	9.96%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.42%	9.96%	+0.46%

TRIO vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRIO vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

TRIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than HOLA's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.87%	3.02%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.49%	9.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRIO and HOLA in my portfolio?

TRIO and HOLA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRIO or HOLA?

On 1-year performance, HOLA leads with 13.44% vs 12.28% for TRIO. On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRIO or HOLA?

Over the 1-year period, HOLA has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRIO or HOLA?

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TRIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRIO or HOLA?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 2.87% for HOLA.

What is the main difference between TRIO and HOLA?

They also come from different issuers: ETF Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TRIO and 0.50% for HOLA.