TRIO vs. KSPY
TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) and KSPY (Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. TRIO is actively managed, while KSPY is passively managed. Over the past year, TRIO returned 14.67% vs 18.09% for KSPY. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRIO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for KSPY.
Performance
TRIO vs. KSPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRIO having a 5.46% return and KSPY slightly lower at 5.43%.
TRIO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSPY
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRIO vs. KSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF | 5.46% | 11.99% |
KSPY Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF | 5.43% | 15.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIO and KSPY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TRIO and KSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIO vs. KSPY — Risk / Return Rank
TRIO
KSPY
TRIO vs. KSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) and Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF (KSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIO | KSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.60 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 3.76 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.59 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.07 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 21.74 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIO | KSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.60 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
TRIO vs. KSPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIO drawdown since its inception was -9.88%, smaller than the maximum KSPY drawdown of -11.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIO and KSPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIO | KSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -11.67% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.47% | -4.46% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.28% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -1.18% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.83% | +0.06% |
Volatility
TRIO vs. KSPY - Volatility Comparison
MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF (KSPY) at 0.76%. This indicates that TRIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIO | KSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.76% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.77% | 5.51% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.14% | 7.00% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 10.53% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 10.53% | +0.18% |
TRIO vs. KSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KSPY's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRIO vs. KSPY - Dividend Comparison
TRIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than KSPY's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KSPY Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF | 5.85% | 6.16% | 1.31% |
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF | 8.54% | 9.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIO and KSPY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRIO has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to KSPY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIO dropped -9.88% vs KSPY's -11.67%.
On 1-year performance, KSPY leads with 18.09% vs 14.67% for TRIO. On fees, TRIO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KSPY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KSPY has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRIO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for KSPY.
TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.54%, compared with 5.85% for KSPY.
They also come from different issuers: ETF Architect and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TRIO and 0.78% for KSPY.
KSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRIO and KSPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer