PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. MAXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than MAXJ's 2.84% return.


SPYH

1D
0.04%
1M
3.31%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.77%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAXJ

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and MAXJ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.80

The correlation between SPYH and MAXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. MAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYHMAXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

3.30

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

5.45

-1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.79

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

5.80

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.13

32.89

-16.76

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the MAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and MAXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYHMAXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

3.30

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.64

+0.33

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, roughly equal to the maximum MAXJ drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and MAXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHMAXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-6.35%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-1.70%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.56%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.30%

+0.94%

Volatility

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Volatility Comparison

NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) at 0.33%. This indicates that SPYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHMAXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

0.33%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

1.93%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.79%

2.93%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

5.29%

+7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

5.29%

+7.08%

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than MAXJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. MAXJ - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, more than MAXJ's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.98%1.01%0.81%
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.52%5.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and MAXJ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYH has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to MAXJ (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs MAXJ's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, SPYH leads with 19.81% vs 9.63% for MAXJ. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYH has performed better with a 19.81% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.52%, compared with 0.98% for MAXJ.

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.50% for MAXJ.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and MAXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer