SPYH vs. PBP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. SPYH is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 14.86% vs 19.22% for PBP. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

SPYH vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's 7.80% return.

SPYH

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 1Y: 14.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.88%

PBP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 6.52%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 1Y: 19.22%
• 3Y*: 11.92%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 7.27%
• ALL TIME*: 5.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	$1.16M	$1.09M	$978.18K
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	$472.46K	$589.47K	$594.95K

SPYH vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	5.96%	20.01%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	7.80%	11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and PBP is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.76

The correlation between SPYH and PBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYH vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYH	PBP
Technology	38.1%	38.5%
Financial Services	11.7%	12.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	9.1%
Industrials	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.6%
Energy	3.1%	3.4%
Utilities	2.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPYH vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYH

SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 92
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYH vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYH	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.42	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.49	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.51	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.45	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	17.72	-7.58

SPYH vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYH	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-43.43%	+36.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.02%	-5.22%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	0.00%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-6.64%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	1.02%	+0.33%

Volatility

SPYH vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 2.15%. This indicates that SPYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYH	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	2.15%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	6.10%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.61%	7.43%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.17%	11.85%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.17%	13.66%	-1.49%

SPYH vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYH vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, less than PBP's 11.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.39%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.71%	5.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYH and PBP in my portfolio?

SPYH and PBP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYH or PBP?

SPYH has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to PBP (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs PBP's -43.43%.

Which ETF is better, SPYH or PBP?

On 1-year performance, PBP leads with 19.22% vs 14.86% for SPYH. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYH or PBP?

Over the 1-year period, PBP has performed better with a 19.22% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYH or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYH or PBP?

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.39%, compared with 7.71% for SPYH.

What is the main difference between SPYH and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.29% for PBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.