SPYH vs. BTCI
SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 14.86% vs -40.21% for BTCI. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
SPYH vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.73% return.
SPYH
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.88%
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- -23.02%
- YTD
- -25.73%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.53M | $12.80M | $22.67M | |
| $472.46K | $589.47K | $594.95K |
SPYH vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 5.96% | 20.01% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.73% | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYH and BTCI is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYH vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
SPYH
BTCI
SPYH vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYH | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.83 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.87 | +3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | -1.36 | +11.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYH vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYH | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -48.42% | +41.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -48.42% | +42.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -45.08% | +44.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -17.81% | +17.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 30.79% | -29.44% |
Volatility
SPYH vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 2.67%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYH | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 7.31% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | 30.70% | -24.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 40.00% | -31.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 39.67% | -27.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 39.67% | -27.50% |
SPYH vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYH vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, less than BTCI's 41.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 41.26% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.71% | 5.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYH and BTCI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to SPYH (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs BTCI's -48.42%.
On 1-year performance, SPYH leads with 14.86% vs -40.21% for BTCI. On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYH has performed better with a 14.86% return vs -40.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 41.26%, compared with 7.71% for SPYH.
SPYH is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.99% for BTCI.
SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYH and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer