BTCI vs. MSTY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -40.21% vs -68.40% for MSTY. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BTCI vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -25.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -33.29% return.

BTCI

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: -23.02%
• YTD: -25.73%
• 1Y: -40.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.18%

MSTY

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: -2.63%
• 6M: -31.98%
• YTD: -33.29%
• 1Y: -68.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	$12.53M	$12.80M	$22.67M
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	$12.71M	$13.42M	$28.94M

BTCI vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-25.73%	-1.09%	26.12%
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-33.29%	-42.71%	33.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and MSTY is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.79

The correlation between BTCI and MSTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MSTY

MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTCI vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCI	MSTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	-1.09	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	-2.13	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.77	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.95	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-1.40	+0.04

BTCI vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is comparable to the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and MSTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	MSTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.42%	-77.40%	+28.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.42%	-74.91%	+26.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.08%	-73.77%	+28.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.81%	-29.05%	+11.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.79%	50.99%	-20.20%

Volatility

BTCI vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 7.31%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	MSTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	14.46%	-7.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.70%	52.28%	-21.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.00%	65.31%	-25.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	71.91%	-32.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.67%	71.91%	-32.24%

BTCI vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BTCI and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BTCI vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.26%, less than MSTY's 251.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	41.26%	36.46%	6.76%
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	251.54%	294.61%	104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCI and MSTY in my portfolio?

BTCI and MSTY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCI or MSTY?

MSTY has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to BTCI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.42% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

Which ETF is better, BTCI or MSTY?

On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -40.21% vs -68.40% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCI or MSTY?

Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -68.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCI or MSTY?

BTCI and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCI or MSTY?

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.54%, compared with 41.26% for BTCI.

What is the main difference between BTCI and MSTY?

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.