PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCI vs. BITY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCI vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTCI having a -23.73% return and BITY slightly higher at -23.61%.


BTCI

1D
2.44%
1M
-14.38%
YTD
-23.73%
6M
-24.54%
1Y
-33.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITY

1D
2.79%
1M
-14.93%
YTD
-23.61%
6M
-24.22%
1Y
-36.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-23.73%-3.92%
BITY
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF
-23.61%-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and BITY is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.98

The correlation between BTCI and BITY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCI vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BITY
BITY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCIBITYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.86

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.73

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-1.29

+0.06

BTCI vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -50.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and BITY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCIBITYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-50.04%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.16%

-50.04%

+2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.60%

-45.85%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-20.74%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.85%

28.39%

-1.54%

Volatility

BTCI vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 12.42%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 13.51%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCIBITYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

13.51%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.24%

31.74%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.69%

40.98%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.30%

39.46%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.30%

39.46%

+0.84%

BTCI vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCI vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.88%, more than BITY's 39.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BITY
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF
39.92%21.53%0.00%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
46.88%36.46%6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BTCI and BITY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BITY has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to BTCI (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs BITY's -50.04%.

On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -33.02% vs -36.66% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 12.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -33.02% return vs -36.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 46.88%, compared with 39.92% for BITY.

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BITY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.65% for BITY.

BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCI and BITY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer