PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 50.21% return.


SPYH

1D
-1.00%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
3.89%
6M
3.22%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-1.35%
1M
-22.65%
YTD
50.21%
6M
47.81%
1Y
38.79%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and BNO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYHBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.33

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

4.21

+7.88

SPYH vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-87.06%

+79.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-29.25%

+23.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-29.25%

+27.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-40.10%

+39.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

9.28%

-7.98%

Volatility

SPYH vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 3.28%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

10.92%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.43%

37.29%

-30.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.28%

41.67%

-33.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

35.65%

-23.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

36.68%

-24.24%

SPYH vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and BNO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to SPYH (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 38.79% vs 15.64% for SPYH. On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 38.79% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

SPYH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 1.00% for BNO.

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer