SPYG vs. XNTK
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 25.25%/yr for XNTK. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNTK.
Performance
SPYG vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 32.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 17.91%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
XNTK
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 32.86%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 65.70%
- 3Y*
- 39.05%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
SPYG vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 32.86% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and XNTK is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SPYG and XNTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
XNTK
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
SPYG
XNTK
Communication Services
SPYG
XNTK
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
XNTK
Financial Services
SPYG
XNTK
-
Healthcare
SPYG
XNTK
-
Industrials
SPYG
XNTK
-
Utilities
SPYG
XNTK
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
XNTK
-
Real Estate
SPYG
XNTK
-
Basic Materials
SPYG
XNTK
-
Energy
SPYG
XNTK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
XNTK
SPYG vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.73 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 12.16 | -4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and XNTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -72.38% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -17.00% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -28.11% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -48.28% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -48.28% | +15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -4.70% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -21.28% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 5.21% | -1.79% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 12.53% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 20.87% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 25.43% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 28.25% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 26.82% | -6.12% |
SPYG vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYG vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than XNTK's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and XNTK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs XNTK's -72.38%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.25% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.25% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while XNTK is Technology Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.35% for XNTK.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and XNTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer