PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SPLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SPLV with an annualized return of 18.20%, while SPLV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

SPLV

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.32%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SPLV is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.61

The correlation between SPYG and SPLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SPLV

Technology

51.9%
4.6%

Communication Services

16.8%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
5.7%

Financial Services

8.5%
16.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
6.8%

Industrials

5.0%
10.1%

Utilities

1.2%
26.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
10.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
14.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.0%

Energy

0.1%
0.9%

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
SPLV
4.6%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
SPLV
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
SPLV
5.7%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
SPLV
16.6%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
SPLV
6.8%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
SPLV
10.1%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
SPLV
26.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SPLV
10.8%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
SPLV
14.8%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SPLV
2.0%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SPLV
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGSPLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.01

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

-0.00

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

-0.01

+10.26

SPYG vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGSPLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

-0.00

+2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.43

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.52

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.68

-0.32

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SPLV's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSPLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-36.26%

-31.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-7.41%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-9.64%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-17.26%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-36.26%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-6.91%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-3.55%

-20.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.05%

+0.27%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 2.97%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSPLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

2.97%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

6.78%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

9.78%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

12.45%

+8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

15.36%

+5.28%

SPYG vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SPLV's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.22%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and SPLV have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SPLV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 8.01% for SPLV. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.25% for SPLV.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer