SPYG vs. RSPT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 18.20%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for RSPT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPT.

Performance

SPYG vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 47.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed RSPT with an annualized return of 18.20%, while RSPT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.

SPYG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 33.95%
• 3Y*: 28.16%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

RSPT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 22.88%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 6M: 46.37%
• 1Y: 75.62%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.75%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	47.30%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and RSPT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.85

The correlation between SPYG and RSPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. RSPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYG	RSPT
Technology	51.9%	97.6%
Communication Services	16.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	-
Financial Services	8.5%	0.1%
Healthcare	5.8%	-
Industrials	5.0%	1.0%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Energy	0.1%	1.4%

Return for Risk

SPYG vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 57
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYG	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	3.54	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	4.27	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.55	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	7.12	-4.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	25.76	-15.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYG vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the RSPT Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and RSPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYG	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	3.54	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.81	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.95	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.65	-0.30

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than RSPT's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and RSPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYG	RSPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.63%	-58.91%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-10.67%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.14%	-26.62%	+4.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.67%	-32.49%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.67%	-33.67%	+1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.76%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-8.90%	-15.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.95%	+0.37%

Volatility

SPYG vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 4.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYG	RSPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	7.02%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	17.12%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	21.55%	-5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.17%	24.08%	-2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.64%	23.77%	-3.13%

SPYG vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYG vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than RSPT's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.25%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYG and RSPT in my portfolio?

SPYG and RSPT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYG or RSPT?

RSPT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs RSPT's -58.91%.

Which ETF is better, SPYG or RSPT?

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.48% vs 18.20% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYG or RSPT?

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 18.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYG or RSPT?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYG or RSPT?

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.25% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between SPYG and RSPT?

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPT is Technology Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.40% for RSPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.