PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. IQLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPYG having a 9.70% return and IQLT slightly higher at 9.81%. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed IQLT with an annualized return of 17.91%, while IQLT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

IQLT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.57%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.22%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.81%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and IQLT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015

0.66

The correlation between SPYG and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
IQLT

Technology

53.2%
11.8%

Communication Services

16.1%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
8.2%

Financial Services

8.4%
24.9%

Healthcare

5.8%
9.2%

Industrials

5.1%
17.8%

Utilities

1.1%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%
7.2%

Energy

0.1%
5.6%

Technology

SPYG
53.2%
IQLT
11.8%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.1%
IQLT
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
IQLT
8.2%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.4%
IQLT
24.9%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
IQLT
9.2%

Industrials

SPYG
5.1%
IQLT
17.8%

Utilities

SPYG
1.1%
IQLT
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
0.9%
IQLT
6.4%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.5%
IQLT
1.5%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
IQLT
7.2%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
IQLT
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGIQLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.63

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

6.18

+1.90

SPYG vs. IQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the IQLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and IQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and IQLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGIQLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-32.21%

-35.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-10.38%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-13.18%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-30.24%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-32.21%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-0.04%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-6.21%

-18.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.74%

+0.68%

Volatility

SPYG vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) at 5.41%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGIQLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

5.41%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

12.72%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

15.00%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

16.55%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

17.00%

+3.70%

SPYG vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYG vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than IQLT's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.12%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and IQLT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to IQLT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs IQLT's -32.21%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 10.17% for IQLT. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.30% for IQLT.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and IQLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer