PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-6.99%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and GLDM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.07

The correlation between SPYG and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
GLDM

Technology

51.9%

-

Communication Services

16.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Financial Services

8.5%

-

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Industrials

5.0%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
100.0%

Energy

0.1%

-

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
GLDM

-

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
GLDM

-

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
GLDM

-

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
GLDM

-

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
GLDM
100.0%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.70

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

4.23

+6.02

SPYG vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.24

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.04

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.02

-0.66

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-21.63%

-46.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-19.14%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-19.14%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-20.92%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-17.65%

+16.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-6.22%

-18.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

7.69%

-4.37%

Volatility

SPYG vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 4.35%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

5.47%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

22.99%

-10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

26.39%

-10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

17.91%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

16.85%

+3.79%

SPYG vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and GLDM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 16.07% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while GLDM is Gold. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer