SPYG vs. GLDM
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYG returned 16.07%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
SPYG vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -6.99% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and GLDM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SPYG and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYG vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
GLDM
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
SPYG
GLDM
-
Communication Services
SPYG
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
GLDM
-
Financial Services
SPYG
GLDM
-
Healthcare
SPYG
GLDM
-
Industrials
SPYG
GLDM
-
Utilities
SPYG
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
GLDM
-
Real Estate
SPYG
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
SPYG
GLDM
Energy
SPYG
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
GLDM
SPYG vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYG | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.70 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 4.23 | +6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYG | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.24 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.04 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.02 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -21.63% | -46.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -19.14% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -19.14% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -20.92% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -17.65% | +16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -6.22% | -18.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 7.69% | -4.37% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 4.35%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 5.47% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 22.99% | -10.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 26.39% | -10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 17.91% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 16.85% | +3.79% |
SPYG vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYG vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and GLDM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 16.07% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while GLDM is Gold. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.10% for GLDM.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer