PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYC vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYC vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.


SPYC

1D
-0.84%
1M
5.51%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.63%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYC vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
7.59%15.31%22.57%23.98%-25.65%29.26%9.10%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYC and ILCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020

0.94

The correlation between SPYC and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYC vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYC
ILCB

Technology

35.6%
35.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.7%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.6%

Industrials

8.3%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SPYC
35.6%
ILCB
35.5%

Financial Services

SPYC
11.8%
ILCB
11.7%

Communication Services

SPYC
11.2%
ILCB
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYC
10.1%
ILCB
10.1%

Healthcare

SPYC
8.5%
ILCB
8.6%

Industrials

SPYC
8.3%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPYC
4.9%
ILCB
4.8%

Energy

SPYC
3.5%
ILCB
3.5%

Utilities

SPYC
2.4%
ILCB
2.3%

Real Estate

SPYC
1.9%
ILCB
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPYC
1.8%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYC vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYC
SPYC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYC vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYCILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.10

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

14.24

-10.58

SPYC vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYC and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYCILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.35

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.64

+0.01

Drawdowns

SPYC vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYCILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-51.53%

+23.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-9.09%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.81%

-19.05%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.51%

-25.47%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.67%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-6.24%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

1.97%

+2.52%

Volatility

SPYC vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that SPYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYCILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.88%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

9.10%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

12.02%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

17.13%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

18.16%

+1.49%

SPYC vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYC vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
0.87%0.89%1.02%1.76%1.34%1.01%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPYC and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYC has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 9.87% for SPYC. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SPYC.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.87% for SPYC.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYC and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer