SPY vs. IWF
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPY returned 15.42%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for IWF. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.
Performance
SPY vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 15.42%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.17% annualized return.
SPY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
IWF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.17%
SPY vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.07% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 2.87% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 42.59% | -29.31% | 27.43% | 38.25% | 35.86% | -1.67% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and IWF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SPY and IWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPY vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY
IWF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPY
IWF
Financial Services
SPY
IWF
Communication Services
SPY
IWF
Consumer Cyclical
SPY
IWF
Healthcare
SPY
IWF
Industrials
SPY
IWF
Consumer Defensive
SPY
IWF
Energy
SPY
IWF
Utilities
SPY
IWF
Real Estate
SPY
IWF
Basic Materials
SPY
IWF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
IWF
SPY vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPY | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.16 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 3.83 | +8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPY vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and IWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -64.25% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -16.27% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -23.36% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -32.72% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | -32.72% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -5.56% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -22.06% | +13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 4.93% | -2.96% |
Volatility
SPY vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 4.34%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.36% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 12.40% | -2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 15.95% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 21.46% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 21.00% | -3.04% |
SPY vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPY vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than IWF's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPY and IWF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWF has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to SPY (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs IWF's -64.25%.
On 10-year performance, IWF leads with 18.17% vs 15.42% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWF has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 15.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.18% for IWF.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and IWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer