SPXV vs. XXXX
SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while XXXX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (400%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPXV returned 23.90% vs 62.47% for XXXX. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SPXV charges 0.09%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.
Performance
SPXV vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 32.17% return.
SPXV
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.15%
XXXX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 33.16%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 1Y
- 62.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.96K | $54.32K | $76.31K | |
| $23.99M | $24.46M | $27.16M |
SPXV vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 14.16% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 4.55% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 32.17% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and XXXX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SPXV and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXV vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank
SPXV
XXXX
SPXV vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXV | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.69 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 5.87 | +4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and XXXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXV | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -62.27% | +27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -37.25% | +28.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.74% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -11.50% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 10.68% | -8.30% |
Volatility
SPXV vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 4.60%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXV | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 16.28% | -11.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 40.94% | -29.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 50.87% | -37.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 60.79% | -42.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 60.79% | -42.70% |
SPXV vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXV vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.90% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPXV and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to SPXV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs XXXX's -62.27%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 62.47% vs 23.90% for SPXV. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 62.47% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
SPXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for XXXX.
SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500 Index (400%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 2.95% for XXXX.
SPXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXV and XXXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer