SPXV vs. ENFR
SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXV returned 16.03%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
SPXV vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXV has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 16.03%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
SPXV
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 24.43%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
SPXV vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 9.08% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 30.71% | -20.47% | 28.37% | 18.99% | 33.58% | -3.81% | 17.01% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.38 |
The correlation between SPXV and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXV vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXV
ENFR
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
SPXV
ENFR
-
Financial Services
SPXV
ENFR
Communication Services
SPXV
ENFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXV
ENFR
-
Industrials
SPXV
ENFR
Consumer Defensive
SPXV
ENFR
-
Energy
SPXV
ENFR
Utilities
SPXV
ENFR
Real Estate
SPXV
ENFR
-
Basic Materials
SPXV
ENFR
-
Healthcare
SPXV
-
ENFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXV vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
SPXV
ENFR
SPXV vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXV | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.23 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 8.24 | +3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXV | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -68.28% | +33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -8.64% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.89% | -15.58% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -20.29% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | -62.64% | +28.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.71% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -15.94% | +11.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 3.38% | -1.21% |
Volatility
SPXV vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 5.00%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXV | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 5.69% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 11.60% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 14.86% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 19.25% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 24.68% | -6.60% |
SPXV vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXV vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.92% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXV and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SPXV (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 16.03% vs 11.98% for ENFR. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXV has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.92% for SPXV.
SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while ENFR is Energy Equities. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXV and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer