SPXU vs. SPHB
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXU tracks the S&P 500 Index (-300%) while SPHB tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 19.46%/yr for SPHB. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPHB.
Performance
SPXU vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 29.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of -41.98%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.46% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SPHB
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 29.05%
- 6M
- 26.31%
- 1Y
- 62.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.46%
SPXU vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 29.05% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SPHB is -0.86, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | -0.87 |
The correlation between SPXU and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SPHB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SPHB
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SPHB
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SPHB
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SPHB
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SPHB
Energy
SPXU
-
SPHB
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SPHB
Industrials
SPXU
-
SPHB
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SPHB
-
Technology
SPXU
-
SPHB
Utilities
SPXU
-
SPHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SPHB
SPXU vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.42 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 5.90 | -6.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 22.17 | -23.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SPHB's maximum drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SPHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -46.84% | -53.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -10.70% | -36.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -29.21% | -55.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -31.49% | -58.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -46.84% | -52.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -4.02% | -95.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -8.48% | -84.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 2.84% | +26.53% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) at 11.78%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 11.78% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 19.72% | +9.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 24.30% | +13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 27.73% | +22.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 28.54% | +24.89% |
SPXU vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than SPHB's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and SPHB have a correlation of -0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SPHB (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SPHB's -46.84%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.46% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPHB has been the lower-risk option at 11.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.
SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.25% for SPHB.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SPHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer