PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXU vs. SDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXU vs. SDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -27.12% return, which is significantly lower than SDS's -18.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SDS with an annualized return of -42.07%, while SDS has yielded a comparatively higher -27.81% annualized return.


SPXU

1D
-0.39%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-27.12%
6M
-27.28%
1Y
-50.84%
3Y*
-43.41%
5Y*
-35.52%
10Y*
-42.07%

SDS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
-18.16%
6M
-18.17%
1Y
-36.23%
3Y*
-29.11%
5Y*
-22.48%
10Y*
-27.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXU vs. SDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
-27.12%-41.73%-43.31%-46.02%36.05%-57.94%-70.39%-56.27%3.97%-44.23%
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
-18.16%-26.79%-29.45%-31.53%30.69%-43.02%-49.91%-41.17%6.04%-32.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXU and SDS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

1.00

The correlation between SPXU and SDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXU vs. SDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXU
SDS

Financial Services

70.6%
94.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SPXU
70.6%
SDS
94.3%

Basic Materials

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Communication Services

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Energy

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Healthcare

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Industrials

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Real Estate

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Technology

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Utilities

SPXU

-

SDS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXU vs. SDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXU
SPXU Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SPXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXU Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SDS
SDS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXU vs. SDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXUSDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.44

-1.54

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.47

-2.42

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.74

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.02

-1.02

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.73

-1.80

+0.08

SPXU vs. SDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXU Sharpe Ratio is -1.44, which is comparable to the SDS Sharpe Ratio of -1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXU and SDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXUSDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.44

-1.54

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.71

-0.67

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

-0.78

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.84

-0.66

-0.18

Drawdowns

SPXU vs. SDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SDS drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXUSDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-99.85%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.82%

-36.20%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.36%

-68.14%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.23%

-75.54%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

-96.48%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-99.85%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.33%

-82.73%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.93%

20.43%

+9.50%

Volatility

SPXU vs. SDS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) at 5.42%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXUSDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

5.42%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.80%

17.78%

+9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.32%

23.55%

+11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.32%

33.63%

+16.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.38%

35.82%

+17.56%

SPXU vs. SDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXU has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SDS's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXU vs. SDS - Dividend Comparison

SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than SDS's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
5.87%5.88%7.89%5.77%0.35%0.00%0.92%1.84%1.28%0.09%
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
8.05%7.02%9.53%7.06%0.39%0.00%0.70%2.14%1.41%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPXU and SDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPXU has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to SDS (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SDS's -99.85%.

On 10-year performance, SDS leads with -27.81% vs -42.07% for SPXU. On fees, SDS is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, SDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDS has performed better with a -27.81% return vs -42.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDS is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for SPXU.

SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 5.87% for SDS.

SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SDS tracks S&P 500 Index (-200%). Their fees differ too: 0.93% for SPXU and 0.91% for SDS.

SPXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.44 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXU and SDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer