SPXU vs. SDS
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SDS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs -27.73%/yr for SDS. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for SDS.
Performance
SPXU vs. SDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than SDS's -12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SDS with an annualized return of -41.98%, while SDS has yielded a comparatively higher -27.73% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SDS
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- -12.83%
- 6M
- -11.09%
- 1Y
- -30.33%
- 3Y*
- -27.00%
- 5Y*
- -20.88%
- 10Y*
- -27.73%
SPXU vs. SDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -12.83% | -26.79% | -29.45% | -31.53% | 30.69% | -43.02% | -49.91% | -41.17% | 6.04% | -32.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SDS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | 1.00 |
The correlation between SPXU and SDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. SDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SDS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SDS
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Energy
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Industrials
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Technology
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Utilities
SPXU
-
SDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SDS — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SDS
SPXU vs. SDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.80 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.92 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | -1.65 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SDS drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -99.85% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -33.08% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -68.14% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -75.54% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -96.48% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -99.84% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -82.76% | -10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 20.05% | +9.32% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SDS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) at 9.60%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 9.60% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 19.65% | +9.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 24.92% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 33.84% | +16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 35.85% | +17.58% |
SPXU vs. SDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SDS's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SDS - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than SDS's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.51% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SPXU and SDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SDS (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SDS's -99.85%.
On 10-year performance, SDS leads with -27.73% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SDS has been the lower-risk option at 9.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDS has performed better with a -27.73% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 5.51% for SDS.
SPXU is categorized as S&P 500, while SDS is Leveraged Equities. SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SDS tracks S&P 500 Index (-200%). Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.91% for SDS.
SPXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.18 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer