PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 15.44%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.08% annualized return.


SPXN

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.48%
6M
9.55%
YTD
11.33%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
15.44%

SQQQ

1D
5.01%
1M
8.33%
6M
-36.79%
YTD
-38.86%
1Y
-54.36%
3Y*
-50.96%
5Y*
-45.88%
10Y*
-55.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
11.33%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-38.86%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SQQQ is -0.95, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

-0.79

The correlation between SPXN and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.96 (5 years) to -0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
SQQQ

Technology

43.4%

-

Communication Services

11.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%

-

Healthcare

10.7%

-

Industrials

9.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Energy

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Financial Services

-

109.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPXN
43.4%
SQQQ

-

Communication Services

SPXN
11.4%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.0%
SQQQ

-

Healthcare

SPXN
10.7%
SQQQ

-

Industrials

SPXN
9.2%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.4%
SQQQ

-

Utilities

SPXN
3.1%
SQQQ

-

Energy

SPXN
2.5%
SQQQ

-

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
SQQQ

-

Financial Services

SPXN

-

SQQQ
109.1%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXNSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.83

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

-0.89

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

-1.63

+12.04

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-100.00%

+67.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-61.03%

+51.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-92.51%

+72.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-97.27%

+72.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-99.97%

+67.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-100.00%

+97.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-92.76%

+88.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

33.36%

-31.10%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.83%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

22.32%

-18.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

46.22%

-35.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

55.87%

-42.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

67.91%

-50.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

66.57%

-48.90%

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SQQQ's 9.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.90%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
9.77%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXN and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.95, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to SPXN (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 15.44% vs -55.08% for SQQQ. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 15.44% return vs -55.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.77%, compared with 0.90% for SPXN.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.95% for SQQQ.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer