PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -44.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 16.26%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.90% annualized return.


SPXN

1D
0.07%
1M
5.24%
YTD
13.65%
6M
13.28%
1Y
32.97%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
16.26%

SQQQ

1D
1.53%
1M
-22.29%
YTD
-44.43%
6M
-42.11%
1Y
-64.38%
3Y*
-55.94%
5Y*
-49.01%
10Y*
-55.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.65%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-44.43%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SQQQ is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

-0.79

The correlation between SPXN and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.96 (1 year) to -0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
SQQQ

Technology

41.1%

-

Communication Services

13.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Healthcare

9.9%

-

Industrials

9.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.7%

-

Energy

4.1%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Financial Services

-

97.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
SQQQ

-

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
SQQQ

-

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
SQQQ

-

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
SQQQ

-

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
SQQQ

-

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
SQQQ

-

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
SQQQ

-

Financial Services

SPXN

-

SQQQ
97.1%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.73

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

-0.98

+4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.42

-1.79

+18.21

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

-1.35

+3.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

-0.74

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

-0.85

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

-0.88

+1.80

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-100.00%

+67.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-65.95%

+56.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-92.38%

+72.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-97.23%

+72.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-99.98%

+67.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-100.00%

+99.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-92.40%

+88.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

35.96%

-33.95%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.09%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

13.81%

-10.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

36.46%

-26.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

47.79%

-35.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

66.61%

-49.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

66.10%

-48.46%

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SQQQ's 12.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.29%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXN and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to SPXN (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs -55.90% for SQQQ. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs -55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.29%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.95% for SQQQ.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer