SPXM vs. PSCX
SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXM charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
SPXM vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.16% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXM and PSCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXM vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
SPXM
PSCX
SPXM vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXM | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 1.27 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SPXM vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXM | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -10.20% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.12% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -1.87% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility
SPXM vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXM | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 5.53% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 7.07% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 6.96% | +1.22% |
SPXM vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXM vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXM and PSCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: Azoria and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for SPXM and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer