PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.16%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and BUFH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXM vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXMBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

2.91

-1.35

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-1.53%

-3.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.05%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-0.18%

-0.61%

Volatility

SPXM vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

2.37%

+5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

2.37%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

2.37%

+5.81%

SPXM vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and BUFH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

SPXM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Azoria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer