PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.39%
1M
1.72%
6M
8.66%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.27%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.50%10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and BBUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.53

The correlation between SPXM and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXMBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.31

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

9.94

-0.17

SPXM vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXM Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXM and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-35.35%

+30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-9.21%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.83%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-5.40%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

Volatility

SPXM vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) is 0.00%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that SPXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.78%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

10.01%

-6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.66%

12.57%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

17.15%

-9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

19.54%

-11.91%

SPXM vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and BBUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXM dropped -5.08% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 21.17% vs 8.61% for SPXM. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Azoria and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer