SPXL vs. XXXX
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds tracking the S&P 500, from Direxion and Max respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPXL returned 81.54% vs 86.73% for XXXX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.
Performance
SPXL vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXL having a 28.14% return and XXXX slightly higher at 29.32%.
SPXL
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 28.14%
- 6M
- 26.88%
- 1Y
- 81.54%
- 3Y*
- 52.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.20%
XXXX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 86.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 28.14% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 12.87% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 29.32% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and XXXX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between SPXL and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
XXXX
SPXL vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXL | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.34 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | 8.95 | +3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXL | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.86 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.87 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than XXXX's maximum drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and XXXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -62.27% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -37.25% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.88% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -11.60% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 9.73% | -3.41% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 8.49%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 11.32% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 35.41% | -8.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.39% | 46.83% | -11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 60.75% | -10.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 60.75% | -7.33% |
SPXL vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SPXL and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to SPXL (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs XXXX's -62.27%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 86.73% vs 81.54% for SPXL. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 86.73% return vs 81.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for XXXX.
Both ETFs track S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 2.95% for XXXX.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and XXXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer